Research and understanding of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have evolved in recent decades. In this piece, we explore research findings using one representative article from each decade from 1990 to 2020.
The rate of identifying people as being on the autism spectrum disorder spectrum has been increasing in recent years — and so has the language we use to describe it and the practices we use to work with it.
In 2016, one in 54 eight year-olds were estimated to be on the autism spectrum in the United States. That year, ASD was found to be 4.3 times more prevalent in boys than girls (Maenner, et. al, 2020).
According to the DSM-V (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder impacting human development, which in turn can have wide-ranging social, academic, occupational, and personal functioning impacts on the child. As such, understanding ASD through interactions of theoretical, empirical, and interdisciplinary methods is key to creating appropriate learning environments for this population.
We chose three articles to track neurological theories, research, and technological developments related to the ASD population without intellectual impairment from 1991 to the present. Shifts in language and study construction, parameters, and methodology were observed.
As noted below, language used by researchers in the field evolved from terms with negative implications to more neutral terms describing ASD differences compared to other groups over the three decades. Minshew and Goldstein (1998) used terms such as “abnormalities,” “deficits,” and “non-mentally retarded” in their paper, likely reflecting prevalent cultural views on ASD. From the 2000s onward, as exampled by the Iarocci...
You must be a 2e News subscriber to continue reading this content. Membership is free.
Register here for instant access or login below:
